Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Abzan Beanstalk , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Cage , Azorius Convoke , Azorius Enchantments , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Tempo
Virtue of Loyalty ranks #311 out of approximately 310 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
White average: 53.4%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Virtue of Loyalty is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: N/A (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sorcerous Spyglass | Artifact | 5 | 84.4% | 3 |
Luminous Rebuke | Instant | 5 | 80.4% | 2 |
Skrelv, Defector Mite | Legendary Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Mite | 8 | 76.6% | 2 |
Autonomous Assembler | Artifact Creature — Assembly-Worker | 5 | 71.9% | 2 |
Etali's Favor | Enchantment — Aura | 5 | 71.9% | 2 |
Sunder the Gateway | Sorcery | 8 | 71.7% | 4 |
Faebloom Trick | Instant | 19 | 66.9% | 5 |
Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 16 | 66.0% | 5 |
Kellan, Daring Traveler | Legendary Creature — Human Faerie Scout // Sorcery — Adventure | 6 | 65.4% | 1 |
Ajani, Caller of the Pride | Legendary Planeswalker — Ajani | 16 | 65.3% | 3 |
Cards that perform better with Virtue of Loyalty than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Mono White Tokens | 299 | 49.4% | 44.9% |
Selesnya Cage | 98 | 39.2% | 48.7% |
Azorius Flash | 57 | 25.7% | 59.8% |
Orzhov Lifegain | 12 | 15.6% | 39.0% |
Boros Forge | 8 | 22.9% | 6.9% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.